见证篇166.我作…

我作父亲的挣扎和出路、绝望和盼望

中午吃完饭,给孩子们收拾干净,太太带孩子进房间午休,我清理完厨房,清理完两个孩子吃饭留下的“战场”,就走出门,开车直奔高速,没有目的地,就是一直开。。。脑海中只有一个想法:尽可能的逃离这种生活。

回到家,孩子睡醒了,然后收拾一下,来图书馆,太太带两个孩子看书、玩,我一个人坐下来对着电脑。。。最终,还是无法逃离,还是需要回来面对,等会还要面对做晚饭、收拾厨房、带孩子看圣经。

内心烦乱、压抑,甚至有那么一丝丝的绝望

作为父亲,我每天需要花大量的时间照顾两个孩子,虽然很幸福,但是同时,诚实的说,很多的压抑、疲惫甚至是怨言,很多时候,真的只想逃离,哪怕是短暂的逃离,哪怕是片刻的宁静,于我而言,都是弥足珍贵的。

每天早上,孩子们起的很早,然后我也早早起来(7点前后),照顾两个孩子,太太去准备早饭,或者是太太照顾孩子,我去准备早饭;吃完早饭后,我要清理厨房,然后就是带孩子看书或是玩;不一会就要到午饭时间,还是一样的程序:我照顾两个孩子,太太去准备午饭,或者是太太照顾孩子,我去准备午饭;吃完午饭后,我要清理厨房,然后就是带孩子,或是去图书馆,或是去公园,或是在房间;不一会就要到晚饭时间,还是一样的:。

晚饭后,太太带孩子进房间,我打扫完厨房,进房间带孩子,太太先洗漱,然后我给孩子洗刷,然后带孩子看书、看圣经,然后祷告,然后太太带孩子睡觉,我去看书、写东西、看书、看手机。当然,在这之前,我要先洗好奶瓶、收拾一些其他的残局。

我和太太之间,当然会经常出现因为教育孩子的方法和方式的争论,也会有彼此的埋怨或是指责,彼此对对方都有些许不满,也甚至常常为此吵架、冷战等。

有的时候,一个人带孩子,有很多突发情况:小的把水杯弄洒了一地,我刚打算把地擦干,大的突然大喊:我要上厕所。带大的上完厕所回来,小的已经用自己的衣服把地擦干了,还顺带把自己弄摔了,自己一个人在房间哭。两个孩子一起玩,不断地出现意外:抢玩具、抢水杯,然后两个一起哭。抱起一个,另外一个哭得更凶要你抱。

我相信,这样的场景,对于很多父母而言,应该不陌生,尤其是对那些有不止一个孩子的父母,这些经历或许都似曾相识,这其中的情感的变化也是很有趣的。

常常在这样的场景中,有着一股莫名的怒气,或者莫名的委屈,或者莫名的绝望的气息,便会产生对配偶的责难,把怒气发到孩子身上或配偶的身上。

有一次,我在做饭,太太带孩子,小的要玩易拉罐,我说不能玩,太危险,太太说没事,让她玩吧,大的在上厕所,要看着,我没有理会,不一会,小的被易拉罐伤到了,流血了,嚎啕大哭。我的第一反应当然是:早就告诉你了吧?就是不听。

这种情况甚至争吵也是家常便饭,举不胜举。

最近,因为不少时间花在带孩子上,所以经历的比以前更多,经历的比以前更深,所以刺痛的也就更深、更真。

我之所以指责对方,潜意识里是认为:我比对方强,如果是我,肯定会比对方更会照顾孩子,肯定会比对方更用心、更细心,肯定不会让意外发生,之所以出意外,都是对方的错。这就是潜意识里的想法,起码,这是我潜意识里的观念。但是事实是,很多时候,我带孩子的时候,也会刷手机,以至于孩子出现摔跤的情况。

之所以有怨言或怨气,也是因为还没有更深、更真的认识上帝给我们作为父母的托付和责任。理论上知道,但是实际上还不知道。

之所以会绝望,乃是因为在本质上,还没有认清自己的有限:作为人、作为父母,我们是何等的有限,我们是何等地每时每刻需要上帝的恩典。

这些道理和原则,我不陌生,也不曾怀疑过,甚至经常在各地开办类似的讲座,也真的使很多父母包括我自己得到很多帮助。但是在现实中,在一次次的忍无可忍时,在一次次的面对乱七八糟的房间时,在一次次孩子似乎不那么配合的时候,这些理论就会瞬间支离破碎,就会分崩离析。然后,就要直面自己里面的软弱、丑陋和败坏,需要去直面自己里面的缺乏和枯干。

于是,我开始能够理解(是理解,不是赞同),为什么那么多弟兄喜欢回到家躺在沙发上刷手机而不是给孩子换尿布;为什么很多男人喜欢忙于工作而不是照顾孩子;为什么很多父亲宁愿出去与朋友、同事、领导聚餐而不是给孩子做饭。我开始能够理解,这些现象的本质,其实某种程度上都是想要逃离,逃离照顾孩子的那种疲惫和绝望,逃离带孩子的那种无力和怨气。尽可能的逃离,尽可能的光明正大的逃离。

诚实的说,我也希望可以躺在沙发上刷手机,我也希望天天躲在图书馆,我也喜欢我可以天天把孩子丢给太太一个人。

前两天我去离家很远的印第安纳州讲道,来回坐飞机需要两天(因为有3个小时的时差,还要转机),我跟那里的弟兄姐妹们说:谢谢你们请我来讲道,你们不必担心我很辛苦,这种出门对我而言,其实就是度假,哪怕每天连续讲12个小时,我都不会觉得太累。你看,我也是这么希望的,我也喜欢可以天天外出服事,理由多么光明正大、多么属灵敬虔?

但是,作为父亲,作为弟兄,当我们能够再次深度地反思上帝给我们的呼召和使命的时候,我们就能够明白:一旦成为父亲,那么,基本上,那些原本“属于我的时间”,就荡然无存了。我最近在听钱德勒的讲道,十分扎心。对于一个父亲而言,他根本就不会再有属于他自己的时间。他的时间是应该用来带领家庭、照顾家庭和供养家庭的。这不是意味着说家庭成为我们的中心和全部,而是说,对于一个父亲而言,这是上帝给他的使命和呼召。

我们的生命的中心当然是神,我们生命的目标当然是荣耀神,这些都是毫无疑问的,但是作为父亲,我们荣耀神的方式是照顾、陪伴、带领孩子,而不是躲在办公室,把孩子丢给太太一个人,自己拼命工作、赚钱和服事,这不是上帝说要的方式。上帝说要的方式是你每天尽可能多的陪伴孩子,带领孩子认识他,带领孩子读经和祷告,在这个过程中,肯定会比工作轻松(某种程度上,不一定绝对),你会想要生气,你会想要发火,你甚至会有绝望,但是你依旧能够仰望和依靠上帝的恩典,你依然能够因着上帝给你的呼召和使命,去面对。

写到这里,我停下笔,决定去带孩子看书,让太太休息休息,半小时后回来接着写。

(半小时后)。两个娃果然再次把我逼疯。过程就不叙述了。又再次验证和见证了我里面丑陋、虚伪的嘴脸。

(我写这篇文章时的情景)想要成为一个合神心意的父亲是很困难的,因为这意味着舍己,这个舍己是彻底的,是时间上的,是精力上,是会让人筋疲力尽的。我们不再会有太多的时间去做自己喜欢的事情,不再会有太多的时间去享受一个人的清闲和悠然自得。这个过程的转变,我用了差不多两年才意识到,才领悟到。

我常常想,是不是所有的姐妹更会带孩子?是不是所有的姐妹更有方法?是不是所有的姐妹天生就是带娃的料?其实都不是,而是她们更有耐心,更有爱心,是她们比男人更加坚强,她们没有轻易逃离和放弃。她们也和我们所有的弟兄们一样,有这些情绪、悲伤和疲惫,甚至比我们更多,她们也都有,但是她们却更坚强。

过段时间以后,我相信我应该还是会陷入到疲惫、劳累然后埋怨的怪圈,但是还是依旧要靠着恩典来面对,这个过程会反复,这不是“一次领悟永远领悟”的,而是需要靠着恩典,一次次地领悟,一次次的回转,一次一次的靠着恩典有盼望和喜乐的现实。在这个现实中,你不断地承认自己的有限,不断地承认自己的软弱,不断地承认自己需要上帝的恩典。

我也认识到,于我而言,成为父亲,还只是个开始,需要学习和被上帝塑造的地方还太多太多。所以,这个过程,不单是教导孩子的过程,更是自我被上帝塑造和修剪的过程。

到头来我也意识到:带领孩子不是靠着“大嗓门”,不是靠着“我是你老子”的权柄,不是靠着“连哄带骗让他吃饭”。这些方法或许一时管用,但是却是失败的方式。这些方式是我们气急败坏的时候想到的,是我们想要靠着自己的时候想到的,是我们想要达到我们的目的时想到的。

这是我个人作为父亲的经历,失败的经历,但是也是靠着恩典去面对的经历,在耶稣基督的恩典中,当我们去仰望和依靠他的恩典时,从疲惫、从繁忙、甚至从那一丝丝的绝望中,依旧能够有喜乐和盼望。

有什么好的方法会让带孩子更容易吗?有没有什么好的方式让照顾孩子更轻松吗?其实都没有,也不会有,因为照顾孩子、带孩子,从来就不可能容易,也不会容易。重要的是,虽然不容易,虽然艰难,虽然还是会充满困境和绝望,但是我们依旧仰望、依旧顺服,依旧在基督里有盼望。

当然,这会令我们想到天父的爱,如何一次次地容忍他的子民、他的百姓的过犯和罪孽,如何一次一次因着爱带领我们回转,又如何为我们献上他自己。

我愿意为所有的父母们祷告,求神赐给我们聪明、智慧和信心,在基督里,靠着他的恩典,更好的带领我们的孩子。

我更愿意为所有的父亲们、弟兄们祷告,愿我们在带领孩子的过程中,更加忠心,更好的持守上帝给我们的特别的使命和托付。上帝给了我们作父亲、作丈夫的权柄,在这权柄的同时,他更给了我们责任、呼召和使命。

见证篇164.你在…

人在教会热闹,耶稣在外叩门。我们喜欢说得漂亮、做得排场,当环境艰难,无法通过事工掩盖内心贫乏,迷恋语言的你我被要求活出来,我们就慌了。我们到底跟从哪位主?竟然如此侥幸,面皮没有风霜,手背没有钉痕?不求一生蓝图,不求全程照亮,但求每天忠于祂。

其实,现代社会的神话才真是多!每天媒体都不断告诉我们,维护某种社会秩序,人们才会平安;建立某种制度,国家才有前途;拥有某种商品,人才快乐;改变某种态度,人就可以突破自我、获得成功。这些应许能否叫人更真实地面对世界,更具创意地面对自己的将来,更富同情心地面对比我们不幸的人?还是只能用来满足人的贪欲、英雄主义和自我中心?它们是在神化现今的制度?或者彻底否定这个世界、逃避社会责任?

平常日子,人在教会越久就越难体会耶稣才是教会的主,他以为某某长执、某某牧师才是教会的主。而在试炼的时候,人又很容易以为地上的权势拥有让教会或生或死的权力。但《启示录》禁止我们采取失败主义来生活,哪怕众人已经向凯撒屈膝,斗兽场饥饿的狮子正在吼叫,罗马士兵的刀剑已经出鞘,我们需要重新学习认识“金灯台的奥秘”:拥有教会的不是某个人或势力,而是行走在金灯台中间、手拿七星的主耶稣。

摆脱对语言的迷恋
当环境艰难,人自然希望多得安慰鼓励。因此试炼临到,人常常很有听道和传道的热情。但所谓试炼,很少是试验我们有没有听道和传道的热切,而是试验我们是不是对所信的道认真,即使利益和生命受损仍然认真。这种认真不能藉听道或点赞来表达,它对华人信徒的挑战是,放下对高言大智的迷恋,而要躬身力行。

约翰一开始就说,“念这书上预言的和那些听见又遵守其中所记载的,都是有福的”(启一3)。仿佛预见到《启示录》可能会被后人当作满足好奇心、猜测未来事情的谈资,约翰指出预言不仅是说说听听,它带着强烈的今世指向和行为要求。

对语言和概念的执着是中国人的民族性,我们相信文字与实体总有某种形而上的关联。加上基督教自改教运动以来越来越趋向唯理的传统,早期教会透过崇拜、赞美、祷告,及圣礼所经历的奥秘,慢慢被讲道与听道取代,我们对文字和语言的重视已经到了不合理的地步。

随着越多有文化的知识群体、城市中产进入教会,语言对中产信徒具有某种想当然的救赎功能,甚至到了一个地步,它已代替了身体力行的紧迫性和服从的必须性,我们以为只要聆听、了解、辩证,然后认可,就完成了启示对人的要求。其他事,只须支持别人去做便够了,例如宣教,我们奉献金钱即可,很少考虑自己作宣教士的可能。

这类背景的信徒和传道人所受的专业训练使他习惯以逻辑和理性角度来认识人和神。一套正统的属灵的宗教语言就变成了他们的救赎器具——初信主的人若能用适当的言语来描述他的属灵经验,就比较容易被接纳为重生得救的人;他若没有适当的语言,就去参加慕道班补课,慕道班很多时候成了学习使用属灵话语的场合。

说出一个正确的词语,就等于进入那个领域,尽了那个责任,达到了那个生命状态。教会亦常怀疑不用传统属灵话语的人是否真正得救,我们不时看见有人否定一篇文章的理由是,“全篇没一处提及十字架、罪、赦免”。没提及就等于没有,在他心目中,救赎是凭借语言完成的。

知识群体和中产信徒最难正视的是雅各的劝告,“只是你们要行道,不要单单听道,自己欺哄自己”(雅1: 22)。他们的学历和生活水平是穷其半生努力达到的,舒适、安全,温馨而有尊严感。要真正实行圣经的教导,很多时候就会搅扰这个小天地,挑战其生活形态,这是不能忍受的。

约翰的光景绝不比任何当代受压迫的信徒轻松,他的前景也不比任何人更明朗。基督或凯撒不再是理性辩论的题目,而是生与死的选择;信仰不再是一个命题,而变成一个极度尖锐的现实。环境不允许我们再用语言代替实体,以第二层次的责任代替第一层次的顺服。危难的日子正是我们兑现属灵言语的契机,不以语言为救赎媒介、躬身力行的信徒有福了。

有了爱,再苦也容易捱过
风调雨顺的时候,马马虎虎地作基督徒,甚至同时事奉两个主,既是可能的又是普遍的。当环境紧迫时就完全不同了。你马马虎虎,时代不容许你,你自己也会觉得没意思。为什么要作挂名的基督徒呢?想想看,假如你只是挂名的王太太,与王先生没有真实的夫妻关系,那是多痛苦的事!作挂名的富翁又如何?作挂名的什么,都是痛苦的。

以弗所教会的信徒们患上了一种很普遍的属灵病征,就是以工作代替爱神,以护卫真道代替爱人。这就是“以弗所症候群”。他们的问题不在没有事奉,或外面的工作不够多,而是里面的工作不够好。基督教常犯的毛病、就是以更多的外在服事来掩盖里面的问题,遇上有人指出不妥当的地方,就爱用许多理论来辩驳,把真相混淆,把真理掩盖起来。

耶稣对以弗所教会的忠告,乃是不要自辩,只需反省,思想是在什么地方坠落的,立刻悔改,立刻去行。从实际层面来说,无论教会怎样努力,也许都无法改变教外的大气候,但教会若肯切实爱神爱人,就能见证神、造就人。有了爱,更困难的时刻也容易捱过。爱的见证所发挥的力量,不容低估。

人内心越空虚难耐,就越喜欢用密密的工作和应酬来掩盖空虚与寂寥,个人如是,教会亦如是。惯于以事工来给予自己身份感的人,以忙碌来代替价值,假如环境变化,没有条件开展外面的事工,那时我们怎样确定自己仍是耶稣的门徒呢?

华人信徒喜欢看圣徒传记,圣徒的遭遇越惨,我们就越喜欢,越得激励。但我们很少想,会不会有一天我们也要这条十字架的路?害怕、退缩,都是自然的,我们却不能让自然的反应为我们作抉择。在害怕与退缩的时候,要听主的话:我是首先的,我是末后的,让我们尝试一起走吧。主对我们一切的主权,在逆境的时候显得最为真实宝贵,而不是在平顺安乐的日子随便说说来点缀的。

当我们为神受苦,很多时候就觉得更有理由求主拯救,心中想着的尽是旧约里神拯救的应许。如果事情没有如愿,就容易灰心放弃。耶稣给士每拿教会的信中,我们看到祂只是警告前面有更大的试炼,却没有半点意思要减少试炼。对于受苦中的信徒,祂给出的回答是:“你务要至死忠心,我就赐给你那生命的冠冕。”(启二10)。

有的领袖习惯扮演弥赛亚强人。我们若坚持只有消耗许多人力和物力的大场面,才是教会唯一有效的事工,当条件不许可的时候,弥赛亚强人的角色找不到舞台了。跟随这种领袖的信徒都相信若不改变社会建制,一切受苦和不公义的问题都无法解决,因此推动权力架构调整,才是改变社会最有效的途径。但这不是信仰群体唯一可以有的反应,我们可以不把当权者作为殚精竭虑的对象,转而用心服事那些缺少支持、无处可逃的人。

这正是耶稣受苦仆人的角色。士每拿教会明白什么是“受苦的仆人”,在艰难时势里,教会也没有更有效的角色了。难道我们只能在安稳的瓶子里作盐,不能在淡而无味、绝望之境作盐吗?

你是在哪里妥协放松的?
近代基督徒有一种风气好奇怪,就是害怕自己太像基督徒,理由是怕让那些不信的人不敢接近他。像一个不信的人就会吸引不信的人吗?叫不信的人由好奇而至相信的,不是一篇道理,而是生命气质的流露。人们常爱引用保罗的话,“向什么样的人,就作什么样的人”,却忘记保罗说这句话的目的是“无论如何,总要救些人”,而不是出于人天然的掩护本能。因此保罗同样写道:“你们务要从他们中间出来,与他们分别。”

在这个时代,不同流合污,为主的名持守真道,我们就不能冀望讨好所有人。若是为了真理的缘故与人冲突,就求神叫我们坚持到底。时代愈紧迫,人愈容易乱了阵脚,事事只顾眼前的得失。我们若只争朝夕,乱世的朝夕是今天成王明天败寇,很容易叫人失望。此时人人都争取他的发言权,都说他是为了公义。基督徒要学习冷静地听,分辨什么是群众的叫嚣,什么是基督的要求,群众会把真理钉在十字架上。作领袖的,不要只一味讨好群众,作信徒的也不要仅仅跟着大队走。

要具历史感地活在此时此地,就是要求自己每日每事均能在基督的台前交账;就是看见一点点亮光,就倚靠祂走下去;不求一生的蓝图,不求全程的照亮,只求祂使我们永远忠于祂,忠于每一日,忠于每一个机会。与其到时结结巴巴不知怎样向基督解释,不如今天就像活在审判台前,这就是我说的历史感。

信徒在神的手中,就像弓箭在弓箭手的手中一样。弓箭在弓箭袋只是处于预备的状态,时候到了,弓箭手就把箭扣在弦上,弓拉得涨满,瞄准目标,就好像神以我们瞄准祂的目标一样。我们知道目标吗?大多数时候是不知道的,但祂仍然拉,叫我们受不了,我们挣扎呼求,祂好像不理不睬。直等时候到了,祂就射我们出去。在风和日丽、目标准确的时候,哪里需要信心和忍耐呢?前景不明、生活困苦之际,像推雅推喇的信徒那样,才需要信心。

教会里面出现错误思想,是古今皆然的事实,教会容让它坐大,却有无可推诿的责任。我们的问题不是有人利用自由传讲不合真理的事情,如果剥夺这种自由,更大的罪恶就会冒出头;我们的问题是太少人使用他的自由勇敢站出来为主耶稣表明什么是对、什么是错。我们容让巴兰的教训、尼哥拉一党人和耶洗别在教会通行无阻了。

撒狄教会面对的危机是:这个在人面前有好名声的教会,其实名存实亡,在主面前没有一样是完全的,竟然不自知。然而“在撒狄你还有几名是未曾污秽自己衣服的,他们要穿白衣与我同行,因为他们是配得过的。”(启3:4)配得,不是说他们做了什么可以赚取救恩,而是指持守信仰以致受排挤、吃苦头的信徒,主认为他们是配得过与主同行的。

配得过的生命,就是活在神前、讨神喜悦的生命,而不是活在人前。不要说你不知道分辨什么是神的意思、什么是人的意思;不要用另一问题来逃避真正的问题。你自己清楚,你在什么地方一定要用别人的意见和利弊的衡量来跟内心的声音比较、用怀疑的声音和辩论的态度扰乱自己的心。

有一则笑话,乍听荒唐,想深一层却道尽教会以至个人堕落的血泪——一个美国富商去见教宗。他们在花园边走边谈,后面跟着红衣主教。红衣主教只听见富商说:“一百万怎样?”教宗摇头说:“不行。”“那么五百万吧!”富商语带希望。“还是不成。”教宗固执地说。红衣主教开始皱起眉头。“最后一口价,一千万可以了吧!”富商显得焦急了。教宗仍然坚定地回答:“实在是不行啊!”富商满脸失望,忧忧愁愁地离去了。

这时红衣主教走上前去:“你为什么这样固执呢?一千万我们可以做很多事情了,可以救济多少穷人啊……他到底要求你做什么?”教宗静静地回答:“他要我以后在群众面前祈祷的时候,最后要说:奉可口可乐的名祈祷,阿门。”

你听过教会、机构为了筹措经费,而向其他人做出降格的事吗?基督教圈子里的现象,很多时候比这个笑话更荒唐。总有人以为教会就是他的,他想怎样搞就怎样搞。什么时候我们以人的理想代替基督的理想,以世俗的标准代替圣经的标准,教会、机构就必然落到名存实亡的境地。什么时候我们能警觉到我们是存于基督手中,祂是那位遍察精微又有丰盛恩典的,我们感受到祂恩典的严厉立刻回转,就重新活过来了。

要自己回想,你在哪里出了纰漏,你在哪里妥协放松,这些是只有你自己才知道的。你回想又知道了,就要老老实实去悔改,回归的路就是这样走出第一步的。

听,祂正在门外叩门
活在这个世代的一个残酷现实是:有原则的人难免吃苦。《启示录》叫人最吃惊的异象之一,就是得宝座的竟是被杀的羔羊。有一天当信徒显现在羔羊的宝座前为一生交账,那位被杀的羔羊也会吃惊,怎么我们可以皮光肉滑地度过一生?我们到底是跟从哪一位主?竟然可以如此“侥幸”?怎么面皮没有风霜,手背没有钉痕?

这不是说,我们基督徒都要自己去“找死”,而是要有置于死地而后生的生命、一种不再害怕杀身体不能杀灵魂的生命、被复活大能覆庇的生命,叫教会能在最不可能的地方建立起来,并且改变社会。

老底嘉教会的罪不是冷漠、属灵热度不足,或对基督冷淡。从他们自夸说“一样都不缺”,可见这个教会在人看来应该是蛮不错的,不大可能在宗教上全无作为。就像老底嘉的问题不是没有水,而是地下水流到此地后水温下降,既无法被当作具有疗效的温泉,又因为冷却不够、杂质太多而无法饮用,他们的宗教活动也已毫无用处。人们在教会里闹哄哄的,耶稣却在门外叩门。老底嘉教会的属灵功能已经患上了严重的“萎缩症”。

面对剧烈改变的社会,人们可以期待教会能对他们有些什么益处呢?教会面对社会上无助无告的人,应有一份油然而生、不能自己的激情,就像耶稣看见人如同羊没有牧人,就怜悯他们一样。我们一定要学会问一个问题:耶稣若是来到我们这个社会,面对着同样的人群,祂会怎样做?祂会将一切问题都简化为属灵问题来解决吗?

就以灵性问题为例,一切灵性问题都是福音的问题吗?为什么主耶稣不以福音方案来解决少年官的问题,祂若用福音方案来解决他的问题,而不是硬要他变卖所有、分给穷人——这明显不属于典型的福音方案——我们不就有一个皆大欢喜的结局了吗?为什么祂不像众人那样,先批评撒该贪财害人,然后才接纳他?

祂接触活生生的人,他们的问题就成了祂的问题。祂以新生王的身份来接受一切代表旧势力的人生问题,而迎战的方法不仅是福音观念的传递,而是实际的解决:迷乱者给他天国的指引,饥饿者给他食物,患病者给他医治。这就是祂面对受旧势力折磨的人所产生的激情,也是至终使祂受苦、被钉十架的激情。新生王从来不为祂的权利作任何辩护,在祂只有“是”,面对死亡及被死亡恐惧折磨的人,祂全面介入、迎战,又胜过。

说真的,当时的教会有什么呢?面对罗马帝国,他们只是一群没权势、没影响力的小民。你若问:“这有什么用?”我便要问:“强大的罗马帝国今天在哪里呢?”弱小的教会却已经成为历史不能漠视的团体,好多人都试过想要抹掉它,却没有一个成功。

耶稣给教会的七封书信,是以祂自己在门外叩门作结束的,我们也当静心聆听祂的叩门声,祂叩我们的心门、我们所居住的这城的门、我们这个国家的门。门内的人可以因着自满自义、大事庆祝,以致听不到叩门声;门内的人也可以因着苦难而消沉消极、自怨自艾,以致听不到叩门声。活在这个时代,我们有责任聆听祂的声音,并且相信叩门者是凯旋的王,听见又开门的,要与祂一同坐在宝座上。

见证篇163.父母…

当年轻的父母不用承担责任时,他们就永远只能是孩子,最终将导致三代受损。

普遍现象就是正常现象?
如今大都市中初为人父母的年轻人几乎都会请来自己的父母帮忙带孩子,电话中理由往往是“来帮助坐月子”。帮忙坐月子是需要的,毕竟小夫妻都没有相关经验。只是这个月子时间有点长,往往要帮忙到孩子上完小学。个别家庭还会请老人帮忙带孩子到初中毕业。然后变得驼背、白发越来越多的老人光荣退休,完成历史使命。箴28:24

对原本年老多病的老人来说,带孩子是非常辛苦的事,何况通常还要帮忙买菜烧菜。不过,孩子们认为这是天经地义的事:“自己要上班,有时还要加班。父母不来帮忙谁来帮忙?现在大家不都这样吗?”就连教会中的大多数弟兄姊妹,也是如此去行。

问题是大家都如此,就正常吗?从北宋到清末,汉族妇女同胞不分贫富都裹小脚,不裹小脚嫁不出去。大家都在裹,请问裹小脚正常不正常?必有人说事情不一样,裹小脚在摧残女性健康,所以属于变态。而帮忙带孩子是为了下一代。要知道,违背天理的即是变态。前者摧残的是女同胞的身体,后者摧残的是老人的健康与孩子的心理健康。“弟兄们,在心志上不要作小孩子。然而,在恶事上要作婴孩,在心志上总要作大人。”林前14:20

蒙福之道:规规矩矩按着次序行。林前14:40
基督徒需要晓得儿女是上帝所赐的产业,不是我们的私产。不能随心所欲地当虎爹虎妈或随便散养,也不能随大流照世人的模式去行。圣经所指示的方法是唯一正确的方法。教养儿女的职责上帝托付的是父母,而不是爷爷奶奶、外公外婆。

请看两节经文:“我今日所吩咐你的话都要记在心上,也要殷勤教训你的儿女。”申6:6-7,“你们作父亲的,不要惹儿女的气,只要照着主的教训和警戒养育他们。”弗6:4

教养儿女的第一责任人是父母,尤其是父亲。不是祖辈,更不是教会学校的老师。过于强调教会学校的重要性也可能存在偏颇。

为什么神要让本已非常辛苦忙碌的父母自己来带孩子呢?
首先,神在创世之初就如此定规。主一吩咐,我们就当听命领受。这是按照神至高的主权来说的,也是我们需要遵行的最主要理由。

其次,在神设计的家庭关系中,不但亲情得以稳固,而且由父母亲自来带孩子可以建立父母的权威,帮助孩子从小懂得什么叫权柄与顺服。同时,在含辛茹苦地抚养孩子过程中,父母自己的属灵生命也得以成长,渐渐懂得自己父母的爱,也由此开始体会到父神的爱。不吃苦,不经历艰辛,生命就无法成长。所以经上说:“人在幼年负轭,这原是好的。”哀3:27

第三,父母亲自来带孩子,就需要处处作榜样,每天为孩子祷告。因为使命既然明确,责任已然落实。既不能怨老人文化水平差,也不方便抱怨社会混乱。毕竟,亲生的孩子你都影响不了,可见平时见证有多差劲。

第四,为主培训属灵的精兵,是极荣耀之事。儿女本是神所赐的产业,我们将来要为此特特在神面前交账。圣经中有提摩太的美好见证:“但你所学习的、所确信的,要存在心里,因为你知道是跟谁学的。并且知道你是从小明白圣经,这圣经能使你因信基督耶稣有得救的智慧。”提后3:14-15

第五,我们自己长大的过程早就忘记了。亲自带孩子与亲眼看有所不同,等于亲身经历一遍童年,益处良多。人生多一次阅历,等于见识增加不少。

虽然自己带孩子又操心又辛苦异常,但既然是责任,就当承担;是使命,就要履行。哪怕再辛苦,哪怕时间再长。如果怕辛苦就推诿,请问若您自己生病,妻儿推诿,你会有何感想?或者以后父母突发疾病,卧病在床,你就因怕麻烦怕辛苦而不闻不顾吗?

让祖父母、外祖父母带孩子的弊处
1、老人需要休养,让高龄老人长期透支,非孝敬父母之法。所谓舔犊情深,跟当免费保姆有本质的区别。当我们把收入看重于老人幸福健康的时候,就属于对神的悖逆。圣经是说:“要孝敬父母,使你得福,在世长寿。这是第一条带应许的诫命。”弗6:2-3

2、因为年高体迈,精力衰退,所以老人照顾孩子难免会有不周之处。生活习惯的差异、代沟等问题客观存在。年轻父母又脆弱又敏感,时间长了难免会产生心理的隔阂。

3、人老了,看到自己的孙辈,情感会非常复杂。经历无数坎坷,阅尽人生甘苦的老人会格外宠孩子。其实对他们而言,不是宠,是弥补自己年轻时对儿女的不足。所以,舍不得管教是常态,听不得打骂是常事。年轻父母看到儿女的问题,又无法管教,心中难免滋生埋怨。

4、缺乏见证。对三代人来说都是如此,都有没有遵守神旨意的情况。
偶尔帮忙,促进家庭敦睦。间或小住,可令全家融洽。老年意见需要尊重,免费保姆不可利用。父母自己需要尽心,付出代价收获丰盛。

必有人会反驳:说起来当然轻松,但实际情况是;需要注意的是,所谓实际情况未必是遵行神旨意造成的。比如夫妻双方都上班,当然无法照顾抚养幼儿,只好请老人来帮忙。通常反驳的理由无非有三类:自己没经验,需要老人传授;自己身体不好,需要老人帮忙;经济条件有限,只好辛苦爹妈。

其实都不需要反驳,因为事实显而易见。
1、你当然没经验,但老人家的老经验,你又不要听,而且其中有些确实过时了。

2、你身体可能确实不好,但老人家能好到哪里去?

3、要说缺钱,连世界首富都不嫌钱多。圣经告诉我们:“因为我们没有带什么到世上来,也不能带什么去,只要有衣有食,就当知足。”提前6:7-8。从前一个家庭八九个孩子,就靠父亲一人做工,照样抚养孩子们成长与读书。现在虽然物价很高,教育开支庞大,但这都不是推诿责任,让老人来带孩子的理由。

说到底,基督徒要处处顺服神的旨意,时时行在光明中,生活形态必须要回归圣经。“无论作什么,都要为荣耀神而行。”否则就只能喊属灵的口号了。按照圣经指示的家庭样式,妻子就应当在家“相夫教子”,而不是外出打工赚钱。

我们消费的标准为什么要向世界看齐?家庭的建造为什么要参照属世的标准?难道我们神的膀臂缩短了吗?难道我们的神没有能力供应我们日常的需要吗?

如今的问题不是生活变艰难了,而是人心变质了。不是孩子更难教育,而是我们的见证与祷告出了问题。需要的不是财富的增加,而是信心的增加。再好的条件,如果父母不尽自己的责任,孩子就会出大问题。比如老以利的两个儿子何弗尼与非尼哈的例子。撒上2:12-4:22

亲自教养儿女自然是棘手与辛苦异常的,但就是这付出令我们懂得神对我们的爱,也提升了我们对孩子的爱。同时,让我们的属灵生命得以真正地成长。所以说,这是出于神的恩典与祝福。
TOP

见证篇165.种族…

种族问题不只是一个文化议题,实质上更是一个“福音议题”。

提摩太·凯勒(Timothy Keller)牧师在《慷慨的正义》一书里提到,他当年在神学院读书的时候,认识了一位姓艾里斯(Ellis)的黑人同学。有一次,他们一起吃饭,艾里斯对凯勒说:“你知道吗,你是个种族主义者。嗯,你不是故意的,而且你不想这样,但你确实是。你不由自主……例如,当黑人用某种方式做事时,你会说‘嗯,那是你们的文化’,但当白人用某种方式做事时,你却会说‘这才是正确的做事方式啊’。你没有意识到自己也在一个文化中,你的很多想法和做法也是文化性的。” 

自私的基因

后来,艾里斯成为凯勒的好朋友。凯勒说艾里斯“满有恩慈而又直言不讳”,帮助他了解到美国文化中不公义的现实。凯勒认识到,在很多方面,我们每个人可能都是天生的种族主义者:我们以自己的文化观念判断其他事物的优劣,然后用它们来论断其他种族的人;于是,我们就会从心里觉得他们不如我们优秀,甚至比我们更低劣——虽然我们嘴上可能不会这么说。在思想、感情和行为上抬高某个(或某些)种族的价值,同时贬低其他种族的价值,这正是“种族主义”这个词的标准定义。瞧不起“非我族类”的种族主义,是人性中普遍存在、难以克服的通病。

种族主义的思想带来种族歧视的行为。在我们所处的社会中,各种歧视的存在非常广泛。但基于种族的歧视可能最普遍,也最可能以潜规则、制度化和结构化的形式表现、实施。当我们自己受到种族歧视,我们往往会很敏感,觉得很“伤害中国人民的感情”,但当我们歧视别人的时候,我们却很难自我察觉。很多时候,带有种族主义倾向的意识,也通过新媒体或娱乐节目潜移默化地广为传播。例如,今年春节期间的一个电视小品节目,主题是要宣传中国的崛起和非洲人民对中国的热爱,但内容引起很大的争议,因为里面有一个中国女演员涂黑了脸,扮演黑人大妈“给中国点赞”,边上还有一只猴子,是由一个非洲演员来演的。

在海外,有不少人评论说这是赤裸裸的种族主义表现,但是国内一些网友对此事的反应却似乎淡定得多。很多人认为,把批评上升到种族歧视的高度是小题大做,还有人说这是海外的人因为长期被“政治正确”洗脑,反应过于敏感了。

在欧美社会,确实存在“政治正确”走极端的情况,但如今反“政治正确”又矫枉过正,走向另一个极端。种族歧视死灰复燃,重新公开化,一些人甚至为种族主义辩解、张目。

有位知乎上的网友在专栏文章里说:“其实,我们每个人都可以算是种族主义者。”但他认为这是“非常自然”的事情,不需要否定、批判。他说:“我们每个人从内心深处,都会重视自己多于重视他人,重视与自己相近的人多于重视与自己迥异的人,这是由生存基因决定的人性。扩展到种族和民族的范围,形成了种族主义和民族主义,是非常自然的现象。这种判断有进化论和遗传学的科学依据,用牛津大学生物学家理查德·道金斯的话说,这反映出‘基因的自私性’”。他实际上是为种族主义做出了一个理性的辩护,而他的辩护是以自然主义进化论(无神论)为基础的。从这种自然主义的预设出发,种族主义似乎是很“科学”、很合理、无可厚非甚至有利于人类进步的。

上帝的形象

但是,这样的达尔文主义无神论思想是与基督信仰完全相悖的,因此基督徒不可能认同这样的辩护。按照基督信仰,不同种族的人都是上帝所造。因为人悖逆上帝后堕落,罪进入人性的深处。自私或自我中心是人的多种罪恶(sins)里面的一种,是被罪污染了的人性,而不是上帝造人本来就应该有的“自然”。

约翰·派博(John Piper)牧师指出,种族主义产生于骄傲,也是贪婪、恐惧和私欲的同伴。按照圣经,骄傲、贪婪、恐惧和私欲都是罪。在我们所处的时代,这些罪深植于社会、文化的娱乐、广告、商业、学术和党派政治之中,你我耳濡目染浸淫其中,心思意念很容易被它们塑造,因此我们很容易不自觉或“自然而然”地成为种族主义者。③

因此,基督徒反对种族主义,有基于我们信仰的原因。圣经说,每个人都是上帝按照他的形象所造(参《创世记》1:26),所以每个人都有一种独特性,都有上帝赋予他的价值与尊严。“上帝的形象”是不分等级、高低的。上帝要我们学习并知道,他造我们是要我们彼此照顾,应当尊重每一个人的尊严和价值。

尽管历史上曾经有基督徒滥用圣经为种族主义背书,但事实是,种族主义正与圣经的价值观相悖。美国历史上虽然也发生过种族主义,但上个世纪反种族主义的民权运动是以基督信仰(而不是无神论)为精神支柱的。实际上,种族平等也是“美国梦”的“初心”中很重要的一部分。美国的国父们深受圣经影响,因此他们的“美国梦”跟“上帝的形象”的神学概念紧密相联。

圣经里的犹太人很多都有非常强烈的民族自豪感,更因为自己是“上帝的选民”而瞧不起“外邦人”。但是上帝借着旧约先知的口告诉以色列人,他们蒙拣选,并不是因为他们比别的民族更公义(参申 9:5)。以色列人也是常常悖逆上帝的民族,因此他们成为没有人能靠守律法而得救的一个“样板”,也是从反面为基督福音作见证。

旧约和新约都强调“上帝不偏待人”(参罗2:11),他的爱普及万族。所以,种族主义是邪恶的。基督徒应该抵制一切形式的种族主义,包括用非暴力的方式跟制度性、结构性的种族主义作斗争。

福音是解药

整本圣经的总体思想,是上帝要借以色列民族赐福万国万民。上帝最终的心意是要全人类都蒙救赎、蒙恩典。基督带来的天国,或者说上帝的国度,是由因信称义的“各国、各族、各方、各民”(参启14:6)组成。基督福音是“上帝爱世人”的普世的“好消息”。因此,基督福音是超越种族、民族和国家的。在基督的教会里,因为相信基督,我们成为上帝的儿女,彼此成为弟兄姐妹,圣经说“并不分犹太人、希腊人、自主的、为奴的、或男或女”,因为我们“在基督耶稣里都成为一了”(参加 3:28)。

正因为如此,神学家、圣经学者D.A.卡森(D.A.Carson)认为,种族问题不只是一个文化议题,实质上更是一个“福音议题”:“上帝救赎的目的是通过十字架把不同语言、部落、民族和国家的男人和女人引向上帝自己,教会是新造的人类,由犹太人和外邦人组成……这一轨迹始于创造,因为所有的男人和女人都是按照上帝的形象被造;它向前瞻望上帝对亚伯拉罕的应许,就是地上万族都要因他的后裔蒙福。福音里的基督确保的拯救……为基督徒的社群带来悔改、灵命的健康和对弟兄姐妹的爱。”

因此我相信,反对种族主义不但符合圣经,而且必须建立在基督福音的根基之上才能“治本”,才能从根本上改变种族主义者的内心,而不是仅仅靠制度、文化或“政治正确”来压制种族主义的行为。

凯勒牧师在《慷慨的正义》里还提到另外一件事情。神学院毕业后,他到教会牧会,成为一名年轻的牧师。教会里有一个姓谢尔顿(Shelton)的弟兄。有一天,这位弟兄突然对凯勒牧师说:“你知道吗?我一直是一个种族主义者。”凯勒很惊讶,因为他还没有专门在教会讲过关于种族主义的问题。但这位弟兄听凯勒讲基督福音听多了,自己就明白了这一点。他跟凯勒说,以前他对生命的理解是道德主义式的,结果变成像法利赛人一样自以为义,瞧不起他人。但当他开始明白自己接受上帝的救恩是以耶稣那白白的、人不配承受的恩典为根基的时候,他的内心转变了。他离弃了自义,开始体会生命被更新后的温暖、喜乐和信心,他也因此意识到并离弃了自己心中的种族主义。

派博牧师在《血族》一书中说,耶稣基督的福音能够化解导致种族主义的那些罪,把人引向由不同种族和不同文化的人构成的上帝的国度。在基督里,不同种族的血脉都被同一个十字架上流出的宝血洗净。耶稣基督为我们流血舍命,也为我们复活,让我们成为上帝国度里的弟兄姐妹。基督福音是种族主义的解药,也只有基督福音能够化解种族主义的心魔。

我想到历史上一些令我们感动的宣教士的生命见证。宣教士就是一群克服、超越了“自私的基因”的人。他们本来可以享受世界的成功和优裕的生活,却背井离乡、远渡重洋,去到陌生的异国他乡,奉献自己的青春、精力甚至生命,去关爱、服侍那些卑微、弱势、残缺、被人视为“落后”的“非我族类”。这不是因为他们是“特殊材料(基因)制造的人”,而是因为基督福音改变了他们的生命,使他们能够跨越种族与文化的鸿沟,活出“爱人如己”的生命。

今天,仍然有千千万万生命被福音改变的基督徒,用行动做出同样的见证。无论是到非洲救援伊波拉病毒疫症的美国基督徒医生,还是到贵州苗寨支教、帮助少数民族儿童的中国基督徒教师,他们秉承的都是与宣教士同样的精神,他们共同见证了基督福音超越种族主义的大能。

是的,我们每个人都可能是一个种族主义者。靠我们自己,我们不但不能胜过种族主义,而且甚至根本意识不到它的存在。但基督福音可以翻转我们的价值观,颠覆我们内心的自义和骄傲,赐给我们新的生命,让我们成为一群不但免受种族主义病毒侵害,而且能够超越种族的藩篱,去关爱不同种族的人、向他们传福音的基督徒。

Testimony…

 Listen for 7 min

Behind “Xiao Huanxi” lies the “heart crisis” of middle-aged people

The plot covers several types of mid-life crises. Fangyuan’s unemployment is a workplace crisis, Liu Jing’s cancer is a health crisis, and Qiao Weidong’s derailment is an emotional crisis. In fact, the midlife crisis is not a crisis of work, but a crisis of the heart. Work, marriage, and children, which were so strong in the first half, are no less exciting. Are you satisfied with your life? In middle age, crises expose why we live.

“Little Joy” is a hit drama this summer, and the topics triggered by the plot of the drama are frequently on the hot search list. Although the TV series tells about the different situations faced by the children of the three families in the college entrance examination, it actually reflects a phenomenon unique to middle-aged parents-the midlife crisis. The child is just a contact point that detonates the crisis.

In the play, Fang Yuan, played by Huang Lei, graduated from a prestigious university and was originally a veteran of a company. After the company’s merger and acquisition, he thought he was going to be promoted, but he was the only one in the company who was fired. At the age of 45, he was laid off. There were seniors and juniors in high school, and his wife was also demoted. Faced with the family’s living expenses and children’s education expenses, the stability and comfort that has always been shattered, Fang Yuan realized that he was at a loss, and finally broke down and cried.

The crises experienced by the three families can roughly summarize several types of midlife crises: career crisis (Fangyuan is unemployed), health crisis (Liu Jing suffers from cancer), economic crisis (Fangyuan’s parents were defrauded of 800,000 by pyramid schemes), emotional crisis (Qiao Weidong cheating). All these crises have one thing in common: fickleness. They are beyond our control. When problems arise, we discover that what we thought we could control is actually controlling us.

It is this kind of experience that resonates with many middle-aged parents. When a crisis like this strikes, can we get through it safely?
It’s either danger or a turnaround

The dramatic plots experienced by several families in the play can be called “triggering events”. For Fang Yuan, the sudden unemployment triggered his crisis; for Qiao Weidong and Song Qian, the divorce caused a crisis for the whole family;

The three families are initially unaware of neglected issues in their busy lives until a “trigger event” seems to open their eyes. What they experienced was not a bad thing, and they were given this window into a life they never had. What we can be sure of is that when we hit middle age, we are either in great danger or at a turning point in our lives.

When something is taken from us, people tend to become fearful, distressed, restless or discouraged. This reveals exactly what we really live for, what really rules us. Whether career, money, power, or love, when we believe that we can’t live without them, when these things disappear or let us down, we feel that life is also leaving us, and we have lost our way.

Maybe your eyes are full of your own children. When they leave the house, you feel like your life is over and you don’t know what to do with yourself. Children are the whole meaning of your life and the motivation to get up every morning, just like the single mother Song Qian in the play.

Once Yingzi broke down completely and ran to the beach to commit suicide. Until this time, Song Qian, who is a mother, was still asking: “Mom just doesn’t understand why you have to go to Nantah!” Yingzi cried: “I don’t want to go to Nantah, I just want to escape from you.” !” Yingzi said: “You are good enough for me. You cook for me every day, give me lessons, and take care of my life. I know that it is not easy for you. I think too much. I, I am not worthy of what you give me. my love!”

For Song Qian, her daughter Yingzi is everything to her. Even for the sake of her children, she can ignore her emotions. The food must be the healthiest, such as bird’s nest, sea cucumber, whatever is nutritious and what to do; learning must make a scientific plan, every second counts, and you must pay attention to and monitor the dynamic graph of the results; the child’s room must be soundproof, and blinds should be installed outside for easy observation. In Song Qian’s eyes, all of this is for the good of Yingzi, but Yingzi is overwhelmed by these pressures. Song Qian’s “love” for her daughter Yingzi suffocates Yingzi. In the name of great motherly love, Song Qian selfishly deprived the child of her freedom, because once the child became independent, she would have no way to deal with herself.

Maybe what you care about most is health or beauty, but the health and body shape of middle-aged people can no longer return to the best state they used to be. Perhaps the financial success and material comforts are so attractive to you that when they are lost, you become discouraged. There is also a possibility that the big house that you worked hard for in the first half of your life is still there, but the luxurious decoration and exquisite furniture can no longer attract your attention, and the high-end cars are no longer as impressive as when you just changed the car. You can’t put it down, and even your spouse has begun to tire you.

Qiao Weidong experienced such a crisis. As a big boss, he owns everything including a house and a car, a successful college romance, his wife is a teacher, and his daughter is a top student. But in middle age, Qiao Weidong began to be dissatisfied with life. He thinks that his wife controls him tightly, “just like managing his son”. Taking advantage of his wife’s suspicion of cheating on him, Qiao Weidong actually left. The reason was – he was bored. I used to think that he was a “good wife and mother, and everything is fine”, but in middle age, he looks beautiful on the surface, but he has unspeakable depression and difficulties in his heart. His wife’s thoughtfulness is gradually no longer a kind of sweetness to Qiao Weidong but the contrary. become a burden.

This is exactly one of the typical manifestations of a midlife crisis: dissatisfaction with life. Suddenly, you start looking around and you don’t like your life. Life becomes goalless, routine, and dull. You may experience constant boredom and disappointment. The bottom line is that you are dissatisfied with the life story you have lived through. This dissatisfaction is not necessarily for a specific thing, but a general dissatisfaction.

These grievances are often hovering in our hearts, and when there is no real hope of solving them, people are easily manipulated by the desires of the flesh. Qiao Weidong then felt that his wife could not satisfy him, leading to cheating. People will constantly look for substitutes in an attempt to satisfy themselves. Some people overeat when they can’t be satisfied, some people cope by getting what we normally perceive as satisfying, and some people become so numb to their pursuit of leisure or indulgence that they lose hope altogether.

Not a crisis of things, but a crisis of the heart

We are all easily seduced by power, success, acceptance, appreciation, possessions, status, respect, performance, control, and comfort. Paul Tripp, the founder of a well-known American psychological counseling ministry, believes that the midlife crisis is fundamentally rooted in inner idol worship, and these idols have a strong temptation.

There are often such temptations in the Christian life. When a crisis arises, we, like the Israelites at the foot of Mount Sinai, begin to dedicate ourselves to other things. Forged with human hands, the golden calf has no thoughts, no feelings, no strength, no life, just an inanimate object. In ways we don’t realize, we give up our trust in God and give our hearts to things we can see, hear, and touch.

These things became our plan B. We ask them to give us what only God can give. We wanted to create something that would give us meaning and purpose, a sense of identity and security. We want houses, cars, careers, experiences, and people to satisfy our hearts. These are very real in the play.

Disturbingly, the idols we worship in the Middle age are often revealed to be incapable of delivering on their promises. Think about it: the golden calf that the Israelites worshipped ended up being a disappointment. The same goes for anything created, they can never fill the void in our hearts. We become sad, angry, and frustrated when something we have always trusted, such as our body, career, family, etc., fails us.

It is important for us to recognize that the struggles of midlife are windows into deeper, more fundamental struggles. The most basic form of a midlife crisis is actually not a crisis of something, but a crisis of the heart.

Tripp believes that many people are in what they call a midlife crisis because they don’t know the source of their identity. They grieve not just because they’re getting old, or will never achieve their dreams, or for some other reason to regret, but because they identify with experiences, relationships, or successes.

“The more advice I give to those who lose their way in midlife, the more I become convinced that the question of identity is not only one of the most important themes in biblical storytelling, but an essential part of a midlife crisis,” says Tripp. We’ve been seduced by false identities that will always fail us. We think we know who we are, but suddenly it’s not. At this moment, we’re a lot like Adam, Eve, or wandering Israelites” .

Stop being seduced by false identities

Once we see our accomplishments as an identity, we become slaves to a constant stream of potential success. This means that our purpose in life comes from our talents and efforts, so we cannot say no or slow down. If it takes away our ability to work on our next success, we feel frustrated and annoyed. Fang Yuan is frustrated because the job of defining his worth has been taken away from him.

If we use children to define our identity like Song Qian, the children’s future success and rewards to their parents will become the driving force behind our lives. We live indirectly through our children as if their success is our success. When we need our children’s success to feel good about ourselves, we do everything we can to support their success. We tell ourselves it’s for them, but really, it’s for us. It is this layer that the Chinese are least willing to reveal.

We become suffocating, bossy, success-obsessed parents, but we turn a blind eye to it because we can always say it’s for the best of our kids. Finally came the day when our kids started leaving home for school, and work and we became overwhelmed. It is a loss of identity as if we are losing our reason for being alive.

We know identities shape our thinking, choices, and behaviors, but we have a hard time getting them right. This question is an important part of the midlife crisis. Here’s the point: When our definitions of who we are are derived from horizontal factors such as family, work, marriage, children, possessions, appearance, success, and position, we run into confusion and trouble. Because essentially man should define himself from the vertical relationship with the Creator.

Such was the case with David, king of Israel. All the efforts in the first half of his life were exchanged for the status of a prominent king. It is difficult for David not to focus his status on the crown. When the years of struggle came to an end and life entered the intermission, he wandered boredly on the platform of the palace and peeped at a beautiful woman taking a bath. He committed fornication, married another man’s wife, and arranged for the man’s murder. God did not let him continue to be lost, but let him see his own corruption in a crisis, and his status as a king could not save him. God rescued David from self-pride and lust so that he could stand up amidst disappointment, weakness, delusion, and temptation.

When David focused his identity on God above the sun, he was able to overcome difficult circumstances, even the betrayal of his own son. The third Psalm was written by David when he was fleeing from his son Absalom. When he faced a crisis in his life, he didn’t question whether it was worth all these years of obeying God. All David did was put himself in the hands of the Father again. He reminded himself that he was a child of God, “The Lord is my shield around me, my glory, and the lifter of my head.”

What we know about who we are can powerfully shape our responses to crises. Many people experience insomnia from middle age. David had every reason to go through nights of sadness and uneasiness. But again, he surprises us by not being an angry insomniac because he hasn’t lost his source of personal security, stability, and joy—the God who defines his identity. “When I lie down and sleep, and when I wake up, the LORD protects me. I am not afraid even if tens of thousands of people come around and attack me.”

David’s sense of security did not come from his status or property, but from his relationship with God. For God was his fountain of rest, and he could sleep in the wilderness as peacefully as in the palace. Even in moments of great grief, he can lie down and rest. David’s experience shows us that what people encounter in middle age is not that God wants you to go nowhere, but the pain of transformation necessary to welcome you into a new and better life. When we focus the meaning and value of our lives on God, our crisis will become a turning point.

Dr. Warren W. Wiersbe wrote: “Middle age? It’s just another stage in the abundant life that a loving Heavenly Father has in store for us. I want to keep growing… There is no growth without challenges, There is no challenge without change. When I was young, change was a joy; now, it often becomes a threat. But I need change—to experience more deeply, to hold firmly to that unshakable country.”

见证篇162.中年…

《小欢喜》背后,中年人的危机

剧情涵盖了中年危机的几种类型,方圆失业是职场危机,刘静患癌是健康危机,乔卫东出轨是情感危机。其实中年危机不是事情的危机,而是心的危机。上半场很给力的工作、婚姻、孩子,这时令人意兴阑珊。你对自己的人生满足吗?人到中年,危机暴露了我们为何而活。

《小欢喜》作为今年暑期的热播剧,剧中情节引发的话题频频上热搜榜。电视剧虽然讲述的是三家人的孩子面临高考的不同境遇,背后其实更反映了中年父母们特有的现象——中年危机。孩子不过是引爆危机的一个触点而已。

剧中,黄磊饰演的方圆,名牌大学毕业,原本是一家公司的元老。公司并购后,本以为要升职了,没想到全公司只有他一个人被辞退。45岁遭遇下岗,上有老、下有读高三的孩子,妻子也被降职。面对家庭的生活开销、孩子的教育支出,一直以来的稳定舒适被打破,方圆才发现自己竟然无所适从,最终崩溃大哭。

三个家庭所经历的危机大致上能够概括中年危机的几种类型:职业危机(方圆失业)、健康危机(刘静患癌)、经济危机(方圆父母被传销骗取80万)、情感危机(乔卫东出轨)。以上这些危机有一个共同的特点:变幻无常。它们都是我们难以控制的。当问题出现,我们才发现,原来我们认为自己能控制的东西,实际上却在控制着我们。

正是这样的经历,引起了众多中年父母们的共鸣。当类似的危机袭来,我们可以安全度过吗?

要么是危险,要么是转机

剧中几个家庭经历的戏剧化的情节,我们可称之为“触发事件”。对方圆来说,突然的失业触发了他的危机;对乔卫东和宋倩来说,离婚导致了整个家庭的危机;对季胜利来说,与孩子关系的破裂导致了危机。

三个家庭一开始没意识到在忙碌的生活中被忽视的问题,直到“触发事件”好像打开了他们的眼睛。他们所经历的并非坏事,他们得以通过这扇窗户进入自己从未有过的生活。我们可以肯定的是,当中年来临的时候,我们要么处在极大的危险中,要么处在人生的转机之中。

当一些东西从我们的手中被夺走时,人往往会变得恐惧、痛苦、不安或气馁。这恰恰暴露了我们真正为什么而活,究竟是什么事物在统治我们。无论事业、金钱、权力、爱情,当我们相信没有它们我们就无法生存,当这些事情消失或让我们失望的时候,我们就感觉生活也在离我们而去,我们已经迷失了方向。

也许你满眼都是自己的孩子。当他们离开家的时候,你觉得你的生活结束了,你不知道自己该怎么办。孩子就是你生活的全部意义,是你每天早上起床的动力,就像剧中的单亲妈妈宋倩一样。

有一次英子彻底奔溃,跑到海边准备自杀。直到这个时候,身为妈妈的宋倩还在追问:“妈妈只是不明白,不明白你为什么非要去上那个南大呀!”英子哭诉:“我不是非要去南大,我就是想要逃离你!”英子说:“你对我已经够好了,你每天给我做饭,给我上课,照顾我的生活。我知道你不容易,是我想太多,我,我配不上您给我的爱!”

对宋倩而言,女儿英子就是她的全部。甚至为了孩子,她可以忽略自己的喜怒哀乐。食品一定要最健康的,燕窝、海参,什么有营养做什么;学习要制定科学的计划,分秒必争,还要关注并监测成绩动态图;孩子的房间要隔音,还要在外边装上百叶窗便于观察。在宋倩眼里,这一切都是为了英子好,但是这些压得英子喘不过气。宋倩对女儿英子掌控的“爱”,让英子窒息。宋倩以伟大母爱之名,自私地剥夺了孩子的自由,因为一旦孩子独立,她就无以自处。

也许你最在意的是健康或者美貌,但中年人的健康和体型都已无法回到曾经的最佳状态。也许经济上的成功和物质上的安逸更能吸引你,以致于这些失去时,你就变得灰心不安。还有一种可能,你人生上半场拼搏得来的大房子还在,但豪华的装修、精致的家具已不再能吸引你的注意,高配置的汽车不再像刚换车的时候那样让你爱不释手,甚至连配偶也已经开始让你厌烦。

乔卫东经历的就是这样的危机。做大老板的他,房子车子样样有,大学恋情修成正果,妻子是老师,女儿是学霸。可人到中年,乔卫东却开始对生活不满。他嫌妻子管得紧,管自己“就像管儿子一样”。趁着妻子怀疑他出轨,乔卫东竟然一走了之,理由就是——嫌烦。从前觉得是“贤妻良母、事无巨细”,可人到中年,表面风光无限,内心却有说不出的压抑和苦衷,妻子的体贴对乔卫东来说渐渐不再是一种甜蜜,反倒成为负担。

这正是中年危机的典型表现之一:对生活的不满。突然,你开始环顾四周,你不喜欢你的生活。生活变得没有目标,例行公事,枯燥无味。你可能会经历持续不断的无聊、失望。最根本的是你对你经历的人生故事感到不满足。这种不满并不一定是针对某件特定的事情,而是一种普遍的不满情绪。

这些不满常在我们的内心盘旋,又找不到真正的解决希望时,人很容易被肉体的欲望操纵。乔卫东于是觉得妻子满足不了他,导致出轨。人会不断地寻找替代品企图满足自己。有些人在无法满足的时候会暴饮暴食,有些人会通过获得我们通常认为能让自己满意的东西来应对,也有一些人过度追求休闲或放纵来麻木自己,彻底失去了希望。

不是事情的危机,而是心的危机

我们都很容易被权力、成功、接纳、欣赏、财产、地位、尊重、表现、控制、舒适所诱惑。美国著名心理辅导事工机构创办人保罗·区普认为,中年危机从根本上根源于内心的偶像崇拜,这些偶像有着强大的诱惑力。

基督徒的生活也常会有这样的试探。当危机出现时,我们像以色列人在西奈山脚下一样,我们开始把自己奉献给其他事物。金牛犊是用人手打造的,它没有思想,没有感情,没有力量,也没有生命,只是一个无生命的物体。我们以自己没有意识到的方式,放弃了对神的信靠,将我们的心献给那些我们能够看到、听到、触摸到的事物。

这些事情成了我们的B计划。我们求它们给我们只有神才能给的东西。我们希望创造一些东西,能够给我们带来意义和目的,带来一种认同感和安全感。我们希望房子、汽车、事业、经历和人能满足我们的心。这些在剧中都有很真实的体现。

令人不安的是,人到中年时我们所崇拜的偶像时常暴露出它们根本无法兑现自己的承诺。想想看:以色列人所膜拜的金牛犊最终只会让人失望。任何被造的也是如此,它们永远无法填补我们心中的空虚。当我们一直信任的东西,例如身体、事业、家庭等,辜负了我们,我们就会变得悲伤、愤怒、沮丧。

对我们来说,重要的是要认识到,中年时期的挣扎是通向更深层次、更根本的挣扎的窗口。中年危机最基本的形式其实不是某件事情的危机,而是心的危机。

区普认为,有很多人处于所谓的中年危机,是因为他们不知道自己身份认同的来源。他们悲伤,并不仅仅是因为他们渐渐老了,或者永远不会实现他们的梦想,或者其他后悔的理由,而是因为他们把经历、人际关系或成功当作自己的身份。

区普说:“我向那些在中年迷失方向的人提供的建议越多,我就越相信,身份问题不仅是圣经故事中最重要的主题之一,也是中年危机的一个重要组成部分。我们一直被虚假的身份所诱惑,这将永远让我们失望。我们以为我们知道自己是谁,但突然之间就不清楚了。在这一刻,我们很像亚当、夏娃,或流浪的以色列人”。

别再被虚假的身份所诱惑

一旦我们把自己的成就视为一种身份,我们就会成为源源不断的潜在成功的奴隶。这意味着我们人生的目的来自于自己的才能和努力,所以我们不能说不,也不能慢下来。如果剥夺了我们为下一次成功而努力的能力,我们就会感到沮丧和懊恼。方圆感到沮丧,因为定义他价值的工作已经从他手中被夺走了。

如果我们像宋倩一样用孩子来定义自己的身份,孩子将来的成功以及对父母的回报就会成为我们生活的原动力。我们通过孩子间接地生活,仿佛子女的成功就是我们的成功。当我们需要孩子的成功来让自己感觉良好时,我们会尽一切可能支持他们获得成功。我们告诉自己,这是为了他们,但实际上,这是为了我们。中国人最不愿意说破的就是这一层。

我们变成了令人窒息、专横跋扈、痴迷于成功的父母,但我们对此却视而不见,因为我们总是能说这是为了孩子好。终于有一天,当我们的孩子开始离家上学、工作,我们变得不知所措。这是一种身份的丧失,仿佛我们正失去活着的理由。

我们知道身份会影响我们的思维、选择和行为,但我们很难正确地获得身份。这个问题是中年危机的重要组成部分。关键在于:当我们对自己身份的定义来自横向的因素,例如家庭、工作、婚姻、孩子、财产、外貌、成功、职位,我们就会遇到困惑和麻烦。因为本质上人应该从与造物主的纵向关系中定义自己。

以色列的国王大卫就是如此。当前半生的一切努力换回一个显赫的国王身份,大卫很难不把他的身份聚焦在王冠上。当多年的奋斗告一段落,人生进入中场休息时分,他百无聊赖地在王宫的平台上闲逛,偷窥到一个美貌的女子在洗澡。他犯下淫乱罪,娶了另一个男人的妻子,并安排谋杀了这个男人。上帝没有任他继续迷失,而是让他在危机里看到自己的败坏,他的国王身份不能救他。神把大卫从自我的骄傲和情欲中拯救出来,使他能在失望、软弱、迷惑和诱惑下站立起来。

当大卫把自己的身份聚焦在日光之上的神时,就能胜过艰苦困难的环境,甚至是亲生儿子的背叛。《诗篇》第3篇就是大卫在逃避他的儿子押沙龙时所写的。当他面对自己人生的危机时,他没有怀疑这么多年来顺服神是否值得。大卫所做的就是再次把自己放在天父的手中。他提醒自己,他是神的孩子,“耶和华是我四围的盾牌,是我的荣耀,又是叫我抬起头来的。”

我们对自己身份的认识,能够有力地塑造我们面对危机时的反应。许多人就是从中年开始体会失眠的滋味的。大卫实在是有理由度过一个个充满悲伤、不安的夜晚。但是他再次让我们感到惊讶,他不是一个愤怒的失眠症患者,因为他没有失去个人安全、稳定和喜乐的源头——那位能定义他身份的神。“我躺下睡觉,我醒着,耶和华都保佑我。虽有成万的百姓来周围攻击我,我也不怕。”

大卫的安全感不是来自地位、财产,而是来自他与神的关系。因为神是他安息的泉源,他可以像在王宫里一样,在旷野安然入睡。即使极度悲痛的时刻,他也能躺下来休息。大卫的经历让我们看到,人在中年时所遭遇的并不是上帝要你走投无路,而是欢迎你进入新的更美好生命所必须的蜕变的阵痛。当我们把自己活着的意义和价值聚焦在神里面时,我们的危机就会成为转机。

威尔斯比(Warren W. Wiersbe)博士写道:“中年?这只是一位慈爱的天父为我们预备的丰盛人生中的又一个阶段。我想继续成长……没有挑战就没有成长,没有变化就没有挑战。我年轻的时候,变化是一种享受;现在,它往往成为一种威胁。但我需要改变——更深入地经历、牢牢地把握那个不可动摇的国度。”

每日活灵(242)…

音频 三分钟

「惟用爱心说诚实话,凡事长进,连于元首基督;」【弗4: 15

基督教与其他宗教最大的不同,就是基督教有基督是道路,所以能接触到真神;其他宗教则没有道路,所以无论怎样敬拜,仍是枉然。

路是给人走的。人若单单知道某条路是通往何处,而不真正的走在那条路上,就永远达不到目的地。人若不接受基督,就永远不能亲近神。

基督是真理;祂不但教导真理,祂自己就是真理。祂的所是、所作、所有、所言、所行,在在都是真理。吾人若要明白真理,必须更多认识并经历基督。

若不借着基督,没有人能到父那里去:除祂以外,别无拯救;因为在天下人间,没有赐下别的名,我们可以靠着得救。

真实是指真实的事物。宇宙中真实的东西、实在的事物,乃是基督与教会。惟有说到基督与教会,我们才实际的摸着真实。这些报导不是真实,不是实际;相反的,这些报导很空洞。基督与教会之外的任何事物,都是虚空不实。我若没有基督,我整个人都是虚空的。一个人也许是钜富,资产丰饶雄厚,但他若没有基督,这一切财富都不过是虚空。传道书说,凡事都是虚空。在基督与教会之外,没有一样是真实的,没有一样是实在的。对那些爱主耶稣并为着今日教会生活的人,宇宙中惟一的实际乃是基督与教会。

我们也许天天谈论许多的事,但我们若不是说到基督与教会,我们所摸着的不过是虚空,我们并不是摸着实际。奉主蒙恩! 阿们!   

生命福音[128]…

音频 三分钟

「因为这不是虚空、与你们无关的事,乃是你们的生命;在你们过约但河要得为业的地上必因这事日子得以长久。」【申32: 47】    

神的话「不是虚空、与你们无关的事,乃是你们的生命」,因此,我们不能把圣经放在书架上蒙灰尘,应当放在心上,以身作则地教导儿女谨守遵行。并以生命影响生命。

当你从神的信息中得到智彗,就会想要把它应用在生活里,并且告知亲友。圣经不但是一部宜于阅读真理的好书,更是属灵生命的实用指引。

既然我已经寻求神、考查的圣言,为了 发现要给你什么样的劝告;因此,你要抱着永生神的道所要求的敬畏,想要顺服的心态,接受这指导。

神对我们说:在你尚未离世前,我不想用永远悲惨的思想烦你、或 折磨你,除非我是要你赶快逃命。如果你已无药可救,被预定在你现在的悲惨中,我应该不理你,才算是怜悯你,好让你尽力去获得这世界所能给你渺小的安慰。但,你仍有机会获得快乐,只要你不蓄意拒绝得救的机会。看啊!我给你开门; 起来逃命。我把得生命的道路摆在你面前,你要行走在其间,就必定得生命,不致死亡,反得永生。

恶人灭亡是自己的选择。创造他们的神向他们呼叫,就像保罗向即将自杀的狱卒呼叫一样,说:“不要伤害自己。” 基督的仆人警告他们,甚至安慰他们,希望他们悔改;但,人在发怜悯的神看着他 们时,居然不听而故意要跳迸灭亡的坑里。

当人确定的真理,就是你无法在未曾归正的光景中上天堂;基督告诉我们,除非你重生归正,否则永远不会拯救你。手上不是拿着天 国的钥匙吗?难道你没有的答应还是进得去吗?你在属血气的光景中,没有完全彻底的归正,你永远不能进天国。

除非人感觉到劳苦担重担、扎心、厌倦犯罪,否则他们决不会来就基督得医治,也不会虔诚的问说:“我们当怎样行?”他们必然发现自己是死的、无望的,他们才会来到基督面前求饒恕得生命。所以,你要努力把所有的罪都摆在主面前;不要惧怕,完全交托。卸下重担,并要让你的心灵迫切寻求神的真理,也求永生神的指引。感谢神 ! 奉主蒙恩 ! 阿们 ! 

每日活灵(241)…

音频 三分钟

「劝你们中间与我同作长老的人:也不是辖制所托付你们的,乃是作群羊的榜样。」【彼前5: 1,3

神并未给任何人有全备的恩赐,乃是分配给各人独特的一份,好让我们彼此倚存,互相补满。恩赐是为了服事,而非自我炫耀;管家不拥有家产,但却负责管理分发家产。

每一个管家都要向他的主人交账;管家能否得到赏赐,不在乎所领受的是甚么恩赐,乃在乎有没有照神所交托的运用,或是否为神运用,抑或只为自己应用。主的工人都应站在管家的地位上,而不以主人自居;不论工作的成效如何伟大,都承认那本是他所应做的分,并无可夸之处。

因此,不仅使徒是管家,众圣徒都该是管家。长老不该把自己列在特别的一类,他们应该看自己是管家,正如众圣徒是管家一样。

在教会中没有等级这回事。相反的,我们都是神恩典的管家,并且我们都彼此服从。主若把你放在长老职分中,你不可骄傲。不要以为你比别人高,也不要辖管教会,好像教会是你自己的东西。相反的,作为带领的人,你应当立下榜样给圣徒跟随。

只有那些在灵里看见基督受苦的人,才有资格作长老,去看顾那些为神的旨意而受苦的信徒们榜样之建立,与因辖制而生的作用截然不同。榜样是叫人羡慕,人人都愿学效;辖制则是勉强别人遵从。

长老最常犯的毛病就是怠惰、贪婪和弄权,并且甚么样的长老,就带出甚么样的信徒来,所以长老应当以身作则。

当圣徒们看见带领的人给他们立下榜样。’借着立下榜样并跟随榜样,至终我们都一同服事,作神诸般恩典的管家。这是正当的教会生活,没有组织,没有等级,没有阶级制度,没有圣品阶级和平信徒之分。为使召会正确的往前,有些弟兄需要顾到行政一面的事务;但这并不就使他们成为主管,而使其他圣徒成为他们的下属。在召会生活中,…我们只有一位王,就是主耶稣基督,我们都是祂的属民。奉主蒙恩! 阿们!    

Testimony…

  Listen for 7 min

“God loves reluctant leaders”, no leader volunteers to stand before God, because reluctant leaders are not easily tempted by power, pride, and ambition. They know the truth about leadership, they must sacrifice themselves, they must be broken, so if it is for their own comfort, they resolutely refuse.

A friend has participated in a training on successful learning. In one class, one person sits in the middle, and other students form a circle, criticizing a certain point of view or practice of the middleman with various negative words such as belittling, scolding, and ridiculing. It is said that this can exercise people’s “psychological endurance”. Others let practitioners go to the streets to beg, and then send the money from begging to nursing homes.

Many of the most popular books in the market are about how to be successful and how to manage. Open it and look at it, remove the superficial layer of fashionable new terms, and some hidden values ​​are as decadent as Qin Shihuang’s policy program. Those who believe that “a man should be cruel to himself” and endure the unbearable in order to succeed are just modern copies of Han Fei, Li Si, Qin Shihuang, and others who believe that human nature is evil and fanatically pursue success. The most explicit expression is Ma Yun’s sentence: When you are successful, everything you say is the truth.

From the perspective of psychoanalysis, a psychologist believes that there is often a kind of “inferiority” hidden behind such a strong motivation for success in Legalism. They are very confident on the surface, but in fact, this kind of self-confidence is just a compensatory psychology caused by their distrust of others. These people are not lacking in ability, but from a mental health point of view, they are often the most unhealthy people. The methods they use to manage the team are nothing more than the old three of “law, art, and power”-the law of rewards and punishments, the art of deception, and status and power.

Is this the truth about Chinese management and leadership?

In recent years, some high-end training often talks about Jewish wisdom. In history, there was a great Jewish leader—Moses. His life as a leader is exactly in contrast to many phenomena in Chinese culture.

Be a leader as a “nurturing father”

The “Bible’s Old Testament” records another ancient nation in the east – the outstanding leader among the Israelites, and Moses is one of the most respected. He received the mission from God to lead the men, women, and children of the entire Jewish nation to escape from Egypt, make a strategic shift, and enter the land of Canaan.

The “Bible” does not beautify the various unbearable behaviors of the compatriots he led. Whenever they encountered a little difficulty, they wanted to run back to Egypt and continue to be slaves. They ate Egyptian meat pots, cucumbers, and leeks, which tasted similar to Chinese people. And he was able to lead such a large group of “unscrupulous” subordinates, endure their complaints, forgives their offenses, and pray for God’s grace and mercy for them, not just a day or two, but forty years!

In the end, because they were irritated by their disappointment, they were forbidden by God to enter Canaan, which was close at hand.

According to the records of the Old Testament, Moses’ life was divided into three stages: the first forty years because he was adopted by the princess of the Egyptian Pharaoh and became the prince of Egypt; years as a shepherd; the last forty years as a leader leading the Israelites out of Egypt.

But behind Moses’ halo, we hear him complaining to God about his own suffering as a leader: “Why did you treat your servant so hard, why didn’t I find favor in your eyes, and put this burden of government over my people on me? Was these people my womb, was it my birth? You said to me, ‘Take them up in your arms like a foster father with a suckling child until you have sworn to give them go to the land of our ancestors’… The responsibility of managing this person is too heavy for me to bear alone. If you treat me like this, if I find favor in your eyes, please kill me immediately, and don’t let me see my own misery .”

The prayer in which Moses poured out his heart to God under extreme pressure revealed a detail, that is, God required Moses as a leader to be responsible for the lives of the led like a father, “like a nurturing father”. It can be seen that an important characteristic of a leader is to be like a mature father.

I often think, if the leaders of all major units are people who have really raised children, have seen how difficult life growth is, and as long as they work hard, they will really see the results. Wouldn’t it be possible to avoid many mistakes of eagerness for quick success and instant benefit, harsh criticism, and suppression? Woolen cloth?

But who was Moses’ father? The literature of the Israelites records only that he was a Levite named “Amram”. Because of the experience of being abandoned, his family life is incomplete and deformed. Although his biological mother was taken to the palace by the princess who adopted him to be his wet nurse, his father figure is undoubtedly missing. This negative influence is a big challenge for him to become a leader in the future.

During his forty years as a prince, Moses “learned all the knowledge of the Egyptians, and was able to speak and act.” He is also full of self-confidence, feeling that “I can” in everything, and sometimes it is obviously his own blood, and he thinks that he is doing justice for the sky and resisting the persecution of Pharaoh.

Moses originally thought that with his status and ability, if he called out from the heights, there would be crowds of people responding. But his assumption was completely wrong. When he went to mediate the disputes among his compatriots, they questioned his qualifications, “Who made you our leader and judge?” An Egyptian’s “criminal record”.

The absence of his father made him unaware that the authority of a leader, just like his father’s authority at home, needs to be established with long-term love. Propaganda, corporate culture, and promulgation of laws and regulations will not play any essential role. Before Moses established the prestige of leadership, he took it for granted that he could lead and exercise leadership by gift and blood, which naturally caused a backlash and failure was inevitable.

To be a leader is to realize your own incompetence
There is a Weibo joke on Xinhuanet: Recently, the abilities of some leaders in various places have been greatly improved: some can hold umbrellas by themselves, some can open doors by themselves, some can carry bags by themselves, some can hold water glasses by themselves, some I actually wrote the speech myself… In fact, the people’s expectations for leaders are not very high, as long as they can take care of themselves basically!

Comparing the so-called leadership in the above situation, it is not difficult to understand why God valued Moses. Although Moses’ method of seeing injustice was inappropriate, his motivation was what God valued: He saw the responsibility that he could do in the needs and mistakes of others. This is the most important quality of a leader – willingness to take responsibility and willingness to give. He never lost his sense of responsibility and courage, even when he fled to Midian and saw the seven daughters of the local priest being bullied, he still stood up to help.

Moses was exiled to Midian and made a living by herding sheep. In the second forty years of his life, God spent time and space in the wilderness to hone this self-righteous prince until he realized his own impotence-“Who am I to go to Pharaoh and destroy Israel? brought it out of Egypt?”

In order for Moses to lead others, he had to suffer through his own lack of leadership skills. He first had to deal with his own feelings of powerlessness and unwantedness, doubts that the Israelites would listen to him, and pained by his clumsy tongue.
But Moses’ self-doubt did not prevent God from giving him the task of leadership. We have found a very thought-provoking phenomenon in the history of the Jews, that is, God only chooses those who are unwilling to be leaders.

American scholar Allen De came to a wise conclusion in the book “The Faltering Leader”, “God likes reluctant leaders”. No leader volunteers to stand before God because reluctant leaders are not easily affected by The allure of power, pride, and ambition. They know the truth about leadership, they must deny themselves, and they must be broken. Therefore, if it is for their own comfort, they resolutely refuse. They don’t aspire to be bigger, better, and more, and they don’t think it’s okay to “make it happen” and ask others to bleed for their ideals.

Aiming at Moses’ impulsive and fleshly weaknesses exposed when he was young, God let him work with sheep every day, grinding him bit by bit. As for the practice of family life, I think it also helped him a lot. Perhaps he discovered that the first person to challenge his authority as a leader and test his forbearance was none other than his wife and children. If he could not lead them well, How could he lead millions of Israelites?

This was very important to Moses. On the surface, he won a marriage for himself because he saved the daughter of the priest of Midian. In fact, this family saved him, especially the father-in-law a father who provided him with the same-sex affirmation and acceptance that are necessary for the growth of a man. Moses learned to be a husband, a father, and a shepherd during this time. Later, his father-in-law also became his management consultant when he was the leader, and gave him suggestions on building a team through authorization and avoiding authoritarianism. There is a mature father figure to assist, which helps Moses avoid many detours.

Interestingly, Confucius and Mencius, the founders of Confucianism who had the greatest impact on Chinese culture, lost their father at the age of three, while Mencius lost his father at the age of two. They also lacked a father’s role model in their growth experience.

Scholar Zhu Jianjun wrote in “China’s Human Heart and Culture” that his father’s early death prevented Confucius from having the opportunity to understand that a real father always has both advantages and disadvantages. The father in fantasy can be perfect, and Confucius often dreamed of the Duke of Zhou. In the mind of the son, this father can almost be a god. Confucius then had the same fantasy about the king, hoping and believing that the king would love his subjects like a kind father loves his children.

But the best fathers are not gods, and the best leaders are also people who make mistakes. This seems to be common sense, but it is not easy for someone who grew up in a family without a father figure to understand. The disadvantage of the result is that the Confucian culture lacks an effective restraint mechanism for the possible problems of the king. Too idealistic about the “monarch father”, with too much expectation and too little precaution, causing the people of the country to be injured repeatedly.
To whom does the leader’s psychological garbage go?

In the third forty years of his life, Moses realized that no matter whether he thought he was a thorn or dross or was despised by the world or rejected by his fellow countrymen, as long as he was willing, God would add His own power to him who was weak. He knew he was relying on God, who made him a leader.

Jack Welch, the former CEO of General Electric Company in the United States, had a classic summary of what a leader is. In his view, a leader should have a vision and make the team share his vision, be full of energy and infect the passion of the whole team, and should dare to try challenging tasks and make difficult but meaningful decisions. This definition is like it was made for Moses, except that Moses’ vision came from God.
Therefore, when the Israelites fought against their enemies, Moses did not choose to take the lead but went up the mountain to call on God for the people. He correctly maintained the relationship with God, and he knew that only the power of God could help the people to win, instead of being brave and rushing into the fighting team to win the applause of the crowd for a while.

Some economists believe that there is a transactional relationship between leaders and the masses. People ceded control to their leaders and expected rewards from their leaders: when danger and persecution came, they expected the leader to be the one who could take the risk for everyone. Once they doubted their rewards, the leader would not be popular.

Therefore, whenever there is discomfort, people will resent and rebel. Moses even encountered the jealousy and slander of his relatives and assistants Aaron and Miriam, as well as the rebellion of Korah’s party. His handling was “exceedingly humble, more than any man in the world.”

By constantly turning to God, Moses poured out his inner negative feelings to God, not being infected by it, and even collapsed before God, and then returned to the people. It wasn’t that Moses was strong psychologically, but that his relationship with God enabled him to go before God at any time to unload his burden and regain his strength. Think about Jobs, he regarded the employees of the Apple empire as his “subjects”, vented his dissatisfaction at will, and spoke harshly. It is hard to expect such a man to be competent for the role of father, so I saw media reports that he could not accept himself before his death His own daughter is not surprising.

In addition, Moses was able to handle his aggressive personality well. In fact, everyone has a more or less aggressive character in their hearts. Whether a man can become a mature man or become a yes answerer often depends on whether he can handle an aggressive personality well. This kind of aggressiveness was manifested in his killing when he was young, and although he was gentle and humble afterward, he still sometimes had a violent temper.

He broke the tablets of the law, wrestled and accused God when he was talking to God, and never gave up easily. Aggression also helps him persevere in reaching his goals without giving up. Moses often climbed the mountain alone and retreated on the mountain. These exercises helped him deal with and properly use his aggressive personality and became a source of strength for God. If Moses tried to defuse his aggressiveness by constantly finding new enemies or launching new movements for the group he led, it would undoubtedly lead to disaster for the Jewish nation.

Although Moses was reused, mistakes were inevitable. He was stirred up at Kadesh by the people asking for water, and he did not sanctify God and suffered loss himself. He accepts his dark side flares up. Only those who allow themselves to make mistakes will allow others to make mistakes, truly accept others, and lead a good team. Moses paid the price of not being able to enter the Promised Land, but he never complained about why God was so strict with him. There are powerful enemies or persecutions outside, which will never be an excuse for a godly leader to let go of his own sins. Because he is the leader, a little pride in the leader will encourage the whole country to flatter.

Moses was not born to be a leader. His first attempt at leadership failed miserably and he was forced into exile for forty years, which shadowed his leadership nightmare. The good thing is that God never uses a great man, but a man who preaches a great God. In the process of co-working with God, his character was re-established, showing excellent leadership qualities and leadership skills.

The “Bible” truly records the strengths, weaknesses, and mistakes of every great figure in the history of Israel. It can be said that it is a book that records the truth about leaders. In some whitewashed cultures, the truth of the leader is the most hidden part, and people are deceived and deceived. Maybe people don’t like it, so when more than 2,000 employees from different companies were asked to list the leadership qualities they valued most, integrity and honesty ranked first, followed by competence.

Companies in the world are still like this, and faith groups should introspect themselves.